mailwal

Thank you, Devoxxians: Devoxx Belgium 2026, wrapped

Devoxx Belgium
DEVOXX BELGIUM
OCT 5–9, 2026 · ANTWERP
Save the date · Devoxx Belgium 2027
4–8 October 2027, Kinepolis Antwerp.

Same cinema, same week, one year on. Want to be on stage? The Call for Papers runs from 1 June to 16 July 2027. Want a seat? Registration opens on 16 August 2027 at reg.devoxx.be, and you can sign up for a reminder on the site today.

Devoxx Belgium 2026 · that’s a wrap

From developers to builders.
Thank you, Devoxxians.

Five days, full cinema rooms, close to 3K Devoxxians, and more hallway conversations than any of us could keep up with. Thank you to every attendee, speaker, sponsor and volunteer who made this year’s edition what it was. If you missed a talk, or want to see one again, the recordings are already up, including hundreds of magnificent photos.

Play the Devoxx Belgium 2026 Thank You video: THANK YOU in large orange letters above the Devoxx logo, surrounded by a ring of speaker portraits

Our thank-you to everyone who made the week. Watch the Thank You video →

$ devoxx recap --event dvbe26
→ status: done, thank you
→ recordings: 192 on YouTube, free
→ photo-albums: 5 on Flickr, one per day
→ next-edition: 04/10/2027 – 08/10/2027
$ _
// The keynotes
Play the opening keynote: Stephan Janssen on stage opening Devoxx Belgium 2026, next to the From developers to builders slide

“From developers to builders.”

Developers are becoming builders. As agents, spec-driven development and ever more capable coding assistants take on more of the typing, the job is shifting from writing every line to deciding what gets built, shaping how it fits together, and making sure it works. That shift ran through the whole week, and it is the theme Devoxx Belgium 2027 will carry forward.

If you missed Stephan’s opening keynote, make sure to watch it here.

Then on the main stage · Wednesday morning

Five more keynotes followed the welcome, back to back. All of them are on YouTube.

Closing keynote · Thursday evening
// Devoxx the mini series · 4 episodes

This year we made something a little different: Devoxx the mini series, four short AI-generated films. From The Rebellion to the Kinepolis in the year 2170, all four episodes are on YouTube now.

// The week in pictures

Packed cinema rooms, a buzzing exhibition floor, and two humanoid robots that took the main stage in front of a full audience. See for yourself…

A packed Kinepolis cinema room, every seat taken, seen from the front
The exhibition floor crowded with attendees between sessions
A blue humanoid robot on the keynote stage, arms spread wide towards a full audience
A second humanoid robot, white and black with glowing blue eyes, on the main stage

Full rooms, a full exhibition floor, and not one but two humanoid robots who stole the show on the main stage.

Browse the albums on Flickr
// The Devoxx Companion app · by the numbers

46,538 favourites. You built the schedule.

Every heart you tapped in the Devoxx Companion app helped decide which talks got the biggest cinema rooms, and every rating went straight back to the speaker. Here is what you did with it this year:

46,538
talks favourited
4,957
talk ratings
840
pieces of feedback sent to speakers
Devoxx Companion · your Wrapped
Your week at Devoxx, in a few slides.

Like the year-end recap from your music app, but for a conference. Wrapped turns your own Companion activity into a short set of slides: your event in numbers, your top track, your favourite speaker, your rating style (The Generous One, Tough Crowd or The Balanced Reviewer), whether you were an Early Bird or a Night Owl, the hidden gem you rated higher than everyone else, your badges, and where you finished on the leaderboard.

So far 111 of you have opened theirs, 129 times in total. Each slide can be saved as an image or shared, and you can download your data as JSON. If you favourited or rated talks during the week, yours is waiting.

// Community analysis 01 · Devoxx Digest

What 175 talks said, read side by side.

Nobody can attend every session. So Google built something that could. The Devoxx Digest takes the live transcripts, room occupancy votes and favourites from the Devoxx Companion app, and uses Gemini to read across all of them at once: which ideas kept coming up, where speakers agreed, and where they flatly contradicted each other.

Its one-paragraph verdict on the week: Devoxx Belgium 2026 marked the end of unguided “vibe coding” and the rise of harness engineering, where compilers, architecture tests and strict type systems keep non-deterministic models in line. The bottleneck has moved from generating code to verifying it.

175
of 205 talks transcribed and analysed
1,064
key takeaways extracted
1,070
room occupancy votes from attendees
6 · 5 · 4
macro trends, consensus points, open debates
The six macro trends · talks touching each

Speakers were overwhelmingly positive about all six. Only the code-review crisis and MCP drew any outright scepticism.

14
Harness engineering over vibe coding. Wrap the model in static analysis, test gates and architecture linters. The model is the brain; the harness gives it arms and legs.
11
The JVM goes hardware-aligned. Valhalla value classes, the Panama Vector API, Leyden AOT and FFM: stripping out abstraction penalties.
10
MCP grows up. Stateless transports, gateway filtering and progressive tool disclosure, after a first wave of schema bloat.
9
Frontier-class models, running locally. On Apple Silicon and on-premise GPUs: faster, cheaper and more private for most workloads.
8
The pull request review crisis. Agents write faster than humans can review, so verification becomes the job.
7
Agents belong in MicroVMs. A coding agent is remote code execution by design. A container with the Docker socket is not a sandbox.
// Overheard on stage

Tap a talk title to watch the full session on YouTube.

>
“The cost to write code has completely disappeared, but the time to review as a human is still the same.”
Nicolas Martignole, 0 to 350 Engineers on Claude Code: What Could Go Wrong? ▶
>
“The same code should always lead to the same result every time. No prompts, models, or judgment calls.”
Sasha Podlesniuk, Stopping AI-Generated Architectural Drift ▶
>
“MCP around the bad API is still a bad API.”
Kim Lauwers, AI Doesn’t Click Buttons: Building APIs for the Agentic Age ▶
>
“GitHub actually provides you 95 tools… That’s 31,000 tokens consumed already before you’ve done anything.”
Tom O’Rourke & Ep Heijting, Building, Shipping and Governing AI Agents on Kubernetes ▶
>
“Coding agents are very good at escaping containers.”
Richard Gross, Secure Your Coding Agent Like It’s Malware ▶
The consensus wall · what speakers agreed on
01
Never let a model guard the boundary. Security policies, business rules and financial rounding stay in deterministic code. A next-token predictor does not reason about invariants.
02
Your AGENTS.md is being ignored. Rules written in Markdown suffer from context rot. Rules that fail the build, with ArchUnit or Error Prone, do not.
03
One eval run tells you nothing. Run the same frozen test set several times and look at the spread, because the same prompt will not give the same score twice.
04
Engineering was never just typing. As Bruno Borges put it, orchestrating agents makes us “even more what every software engineer likes to do, which is to architect software.”
// The debate arena · where they disagreed

The more interesting half of the Digest. Four questions on which speakers in different rooms gave opposite answers:

A vs B
Agent loops vs deterministic workflows
“You should be designing loops that prompt your agents” (Guillaume Laforge & Wietse Venema), against Jeremy Adams’ Agents Shouldn’t Control Control Flow.
A vs B
Are unit tests still worth it?
Fast unit tests are non-negotiable, say some. Others argue AI-written unit tests just mirror the code, and end-to-end tests matter more.
A vs B
Microservices vs modular monoliths
Distributed bounded contexts for team autonomy, or in-process modules (Spring Modulith) without the distributed-transaction pain.
A vs B
Tool calling vs structured output
Tool calling is what makes an agent, or it burns tokens and drifts, and typed structured output plus a fast classifier does the job better.

The crowd had opinions too. The most-favourited session of the week was Victor Rentea’s Architecture Observability and Guardrails, with 856 favourites. The fullest room, by attendees’ own occupancy votes, was Jonathan Vila López’s Agents With Seatbelts, at 99%. Both were talks about keeping AI-generated code under control.

The Digest is not just a report. Its Ask tab lets you put your own question to every transcript at once, and its Company Lens filters the whole conference down to what was said about one company’s products. Every quote links back to its talk.

// Community analysis 02 · YouTube audience

What earned the audience?

The Digest tells you what speakers said. Bruno Borges wanted to know what people watched. The Devoxx 2026 YouTube dashboard takes a snapshot of every public Devoxx Belgium 2026 video on our channel and lets you slice it by topic, date and reach. You can even look up your own talk and see where it sits against the other 191.

The numbers below are from the dashboard’s snapshot of 20 October, eleven days after the closing talk.

192
videos published
291,615
views
2,352
likes
780
median views per video
Most watched · views as of 20 Oct

Two talks broke 10,000 views. The top ten together account for 28% of all views.

// AI got the talks, Java got the views

This is the finding we like best. Bruno’s dashboard tags each video by keywords in its title. AI and agents dominate the catalogue, but the typical Java video draws more viewers and more likes:

$ topics --sort videos --show median,like-rate
→ ai-and-agents 79 videos · median 777 · 0.73%
→ java-and-jvm 46 videos · median 1,066 · 0.99%
→ testing-tooling 30 videos · median 1,076 · 0.79%
→ people-practice 27 videos · median 943 · 0.80%
→ architecture 23 videos · median 691 · 0.68%
$ _

The like-rate leaderboard tells the same story. Among videos with at least 500 views, the highest like rates go to runtime talks: Ron Pressler’s Big Runtimes Make Efficient Programs (3.9%), Daniel Garnier-Moiroux and Josh Long’s Bootiful Security, and Juan Fumero’s talk on GPU computing in Java. And the two Java-platform talks in the top five were only published on 13 October, so they are still catching up.

Put the two analyses side by side and they line up. The most-watched video of the year is about leaving microservices for a modular monolith, which is exactly one of the four debates the Digest found speakers split on. The argument clearly did not stay in the room.

Read these as reach, not quality, as Bruno is careful to say. Videos published earlier have had more days to collect views, and topics are matched on title words only, so one talk can count towards several.

Missed a talk? · Free on YouTube
Every recorded session, free to watch.

The median Devoxx video has fewer than 800 views, so there is a good chance your favourite talk is still waiting to be found. Watch it, like it, and share it with the colleague who could not make it to Antwerp. Speakers notice, and so do we.

// Thanks to our sponsors

Devoxx Belgium 2026 was only possible because these companies backed it. Thank you for another great week.