mailwal

Google's school AI ultimatum

9to5Google

Google’s AI search fumbles leave schools in the lurch

In partnership with

Good morning, and happy Ocarina of Time day to all who celebrate. Oh, and speaking of celebrating: congratulations to the real winners of the midterms, YouTube and Twitch streamers.

Inbox is the tech newsletter that goes beyond the news cycle. We cover the most important 9to5Google stories from the last couple of days along with a few highlights from around the web. We publish every Tuesday and Thursday, and if you like what you read, please subscribe.

Inbox is written by Daniel Bader. Read previous issues here, and then catch up with Ben Schoon’s excellent Weekender column published every Sunday.

⭐️ Starred

It's hard to overstate how reliant US school districts are on Google. Almost every school board in the country purchases Chromebooks for their students, many of whom are able to take them home and treat them as personal laptops. IT and procurement managers like them because they're relatively cheap and offer zero-touch enrollment, which lowers upfront and ongoing maintenance costs. Teachers also like them because Google Classroom is relatively intuitive and ChromeOS is optimized for most other web-based education platforms.

But this reliance on Google's tech stack comes at a cost: school boards are forced to comply with the company's capricious terms of service, in particular when it comes to the creeping proliferation of AI across its products.

Things came to a head earlier this week when the New York Times reported that changes to the Google Search experience in schools will require opting into Gemini, Gemini Notebook, Gemini in Classroom, and, perhaps most importantly, AI Overviews. The move actually comes after Google was pressured to make student AI usage opt-in. Google's justification: search and AI are now "deeply integrated" in the tech stack, so disabling one means disabling the other.

Google's alternative to AI Overviews is a new Guided Learning feature, which replaces search's primary function — solving a problem — with a step-by-step guide that helps a student understand said problem.

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan took to X to decry the move: "Google is using its search monopoly to coerce schools into adopting AI," she said. "This highlights the danger of allowing an unregulated monopolist to control an essential service. Multiple courts have found Google liable for violating antitrust laws, and this latest move shows it remains unchastened. As the public increasingly pushes back against the use of AI in schools, Google is making clear it will punish those who don’t fall in line."

I have a feeling Google will need to walk back this decision in some form. As 9to5's Ben Schoon points out, it's comically easy to disable AI Overviews in the current version of Google Search, and it doesn't seem to have a detrimental impact on the subsequent results. But Google is likely worried that if it is forced to carve out versions of the search experience for specific user bases, revenue from its burgeoning AI Overviews ad business may be impacted.

Even if Google sticks to its proverbial guns, the move exposes a rift between the public, particularly parents, and the tech giants pushing AI on their users. Furthermore, the AI boom has had a direct impact on educators' ability to purchase new hardware and upgrade old Chromebook fleets, since component prices have increased by as much as 5x over the past year. Some lower-income districts are even recalling Chromebooks from students, reverting to a shared laptop pool to save money.

✉️ Inbox

➡️ FWD:

For a much less complicated relationship with Google Search, try its Ocarina of Time Easter egg. Search for “Zelda” or “Ocarina of Time,” then tap the Master Sword to travel back to a 1998-style results page, complete with Link’s sound effects. It's a trip down memory lane to a time when, as even Google acknowledges, things were a whole lot simpler.

Was AI on the ballot? According to Ben Thompson at Stratechery, it was in a big way. Democrats and Republicans both rejected data centers, but Democrats want to actually pass some regulation reining in the hyperscalers' and frontier labs' ambitions.

First we were short on compute, but that ramped; now we are short on memory, but that will ramp; we were coming close to being short on power, but that will be rectified. The final constraint is political, and that may be the most imposing constraint of all. Not only is it harder to solve, but it actually interferes with solving the other constraints. Many of the theories about AI assume that it becomes a commodity; I think it’s just as likely we are looking at scarcity for much longer than we expected, which will have ripple effects on everything.

Is it possible to pass broad AI regulation that will slow down an industry that has been allowed to run unchecked since Trump's reelection in 2024? And is it in the best interest of these companies to support it, even if it means a short-term slowdown at a time when the two biggest AI labs, Anthropic and OpenAI, are about to IPO?

Some fascinating developments in the $6.3 billion Binance hack: turns out it was yet another case of social engineering. A Binance engineer was lured into a fake job interview, before which he downloaded malware that let hackers breach his computer and, eventually, others on the network.

🗑️ Trash

After my discussion with Will last week about the death of browsers, it came as no surprise to learn that Brave is being sued by the New York Times for copyright infringement. Brave is accused of scraping paywalled material from sites like nytimes.com and selling access to it through a search API to AI companies, which use it as training data. Yes, it's difficult to earn money as a browser maker (see Arc for another compelling example), but this is particularly egregious, even for a company familiar with shady business practices.

Like what you just read? Subscribe to Inbox today and get it in your email every Tuesday and Thursday morning. Got feedback? Send us an email.

You can also support us by becoming a 9to5Google Pro member, starting at just $5/month. You get bonus podcast episodes, access to our members-only Discord server, and lots more.

Thanks for reading, and have a great day. I'll talk to you on Tuesday.

—Daniel

100 Genius Side Hustles

Ready to stop scrolling job boards and start building something of your own?

The Hustle's free "Side Hustle Ideas Database" uncovers 100 unconventional, actually-actionable ways to earn on the side.

Inside you'll find:

  • A curated list of 100 real side hustle ideas spanning e-commerce, services, content, and weird corners of the internet most people never think to look

  • Opportunities at every level, whether you have 5 hours a week or 50, zero capital or a small runway

  • Offbeat, under-the-radar ideas you won't find in generic "how to make money" listicles

Subscribe for free today and get instant access. Your next income stream is one click away.

You are receiving this email because you signed up for our emails at 9to5Google.com.

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here

© 2026 925, LLC. All rights reserved.

420 S RIVERSIDE AVE # 145
Croton On Hudson, New York 10520, United States