The Day the Diagnosis Arrived, and What I Did Next
The Day the Diagnosis Arrived, and What I Did Next
On adaptation as the refusal to be undone by what changes.
Subscribed
—
The diagnosis arrived at fifty-three. I will not go into the medical specifics, partly because they are not the subject of this essay, and partly because I made a decision early in the process that the cancer would not become the thing that organised my life or the lives of the people around me. The decision was not denial. It was a specific choice about what to adapt to and what to resist.
What I adapted to: the treatment, the appointments, the physical reality of what the body was going through and what it would need. These were facts, and facts are what you work with.
What I resisted: the reframing of the rest of my life around the illness. The becoming of a person-who-has-cancer rather than a person who, among other things, currently has cancer. The allowing of the illness to become the organising principle of the household, the conversation, the future.
The distinction is not as clean as it sounds. There were days when it collapsed entirely. There were months when the treatment was the dominant fact of every day, and pretending otherwise would have been dishonest. But the distinction held often enough to matter, and the holding of it was the thing I mean by adaptation.
—
Alex Zanardi lost both his legs in 2001, in a racing accident at the Lausitzring. He was thirty-four and at the height of a great career. What he did in the months after the surgery was make a specific choice about the question he was going to ask for the rest of his life. He decided not to spend it asking what the legs prevented him from doing. He decided to spend it asking how he was going to do the things he wanted to do, given the legs he no longer had.
He raced again. He won Paralympic gold medals in handcycling. He completed Ironman triathlons. He returned to the Lausitzring in 2003 to finish the thirteen laps the accident had prevented him from completing. None of this was a triumph of the body. The body had been irreversibly changed and would never be what it had been. What had not been changed — what he refused to let be changed — was the question he was willing to ask.
I want to be careful here, because Zanardi’s case is extreme and mine was not. The point of the example is not that we should all be Zanardi, or that cancer at fifty-three and losing both legs at thirty-four are equivalents. They are not. The point is that the same instrument — the choice of question, the refusal to let the changed circumstance set the terms of the rest of the life — is available at every scale of difficulty, not only the extreme ones.
—
The question Zanardi asked is: not what does this prevent, but how am I going to do what I want to do, given what is.
The question has two parts and both matter. ‘How am I going to do what I want to do’ requires knowing what you want to do, which is the work of the previous bearings. ‘Given what is’ requires looking honestly at the constraint rather than pretending it does not exist or catastrophising it into something larger than it is.
After the rails, the constraints change character. The constraints of the rails phase — the mortgage, the children who needed raising, the career that needed advancing — recede. In their place arrive the constraints of the post-rails phase: health, energy, time, the bodies we are now living in. These are real. They require genuine adaptation. The adaptation is not pretending the constraints are not there. It is asking, given that they are there, what is still possible.
The answer, almost always, is more than you think.
The cancer, eventually, became part of the history rather than part of the present. The rebuilding that followed it — physical, above all, because the physical reserves were what I had least of when the treatment ended — was itself a version of the same question: not what has this taken, but what is still available.
The question did not answer itself. It had to be asked, deliberately, on days when it was easier not to.
—
If you are already a subscriber, thank you for your support.If you have not yet please subscribe to receive the next essay. The insights continue to be free, fortnightly, with no other agenda than the work above.
Please encourage your family, friends and colleagues to subscribe and support my work.
—
November 2nd 2026
—
© 2026 Paul Duggan
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104